Also, something isn't quite right with either his birthdate or his marriage date(I have a marriage date of 1684). I'm inclined to believe he would have been born closer to 1659. That would have made him about 25 when he married. Otherwise he'd have only been a child when he was married - which I doubt.
Hope someone out there has some clear answers to this puzzle!
|Home | Help | About Us | Site Index | Jobs | PRIVACY | Affiliate|
|© 2007 The Generations Network|